PDA

View Full Version : Not guilty plea in Internet Suicide case


Gio Takahashi
06-17-2008, 11:09
Not guilty plea in Internet suicide case Mo. woman accused of role in MySpace hoax that ended with teen's death
The Associated Press
updated 3:54 p.m. ET, Mon., June. 16, 2008



LOS ANGELES - A Missouri woman pleaded not guilty in Los Angeles federal court Monday to charges in an Internet hoax blamed for a 13-year-old girl's suicide.


Lori Drew, 49, stood quietly beside her attorney Monday. She pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiracy and accessing protected computers without authorization to get information used to inflict emotional distress. She is free on $20,000 bond.


The proceeding lasted only a few minutes. Drew and her lawyer declined to comment to reporters waiting outside the courtroom.


Drew, of suburban St. Louis, Mo., is accused of helping to create a MySpace account that appeared to belong to a 16-year-old boy named Josh Evans. The boy did not exist.


Drew's daughter had been a friend of 13-year-old neighbor Megan Meier and the fake account was used to send cruel messages to the girl, including one stating the world would be better off without her. Megan hanged herself in 2006.


Drew has denied creating the account or sending messages to Meier.
The charges were filed in California where MySpace is based. MySpace is a subsidiary of Beverly Hills-based Fox Interactive Media Inc., which is owned by News Corp.


Drew's case was assigned to U.S. District Court Judge George Wu and her trial scheduled for July 29. A status conference was scheduled for June 26. U.S. attorney's spokesman Thom Mrozek said Drew would be allowed to return home pending trial.


Each of the four counts against Drew carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

New ground in Internet law



Drew's lawyer has said he will challenge the charges.
Experts have said the case could break new ground in Internet law. The statute used to indict Drew usually applies to Internet hackers who illegally access accounts to get information.


U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien has acknowledged this is the first time the federal statute on accessing protected computers has been used in a social-networking case.


Rebecca Lonergan, a former federal prosecutor who now teaches law at the University of Southern California, has said use of statute, known as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, may be open to challenge.


Lonergan said the crimes covered by the law involve obtaining information from a computer, not sending messages out to harass someone.


"Here it is the flow of information away from the computer," she said. "It's a very creative, aggressive use of the statute. But they may have a legally tough time meeting the elements."


James Chadwick, a Palo Alto attorney who specializes in Internet and media law, said he has never seen the statute applied to the sending of messages.


He said it was probable that liability for the girl's death would not be an issue in the case. "As tragic as it is," he said, "You can't start imposing liability on people for being cruel."


Missouri police didn't file any charges against Drew in part because there was no applicable state law. In response to the case, Missouri legislators gave final approval to a bill making cyber harassment illegal.


URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25186093/

(http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25186093/)

RonDo
06-17-2008, 11:30
20 years max eh? Seems like so little when there is a death involved. Take the average persons lifespan here in America, subtract the girl's age and sentence that person that many years.

Killer_Man_
06-17-2008, 13:58
Meh, to be honest. I would have taught the kid to ignore things like that. Especially just to block the person.

What is with letting 13 year olds on myspace without knowing any rules or the habits of the net. Trust no one, ignore those who piss you off or make you get riled up.

That is why I love the internet, if I dislike someone or they harrass me. The almighty block/ban/whatever button is there. If they keep making more accounts, report them to the higher ups and keep blocking. Simple as that. xD

Frozen
06-17-2008, 17:07
This just proves the law is not ready to fully grasp the concept of the internet.
Or the old can't handle the new.
Or the internet is way ahead of it's time.
Or the internet is a bank robber going at 200mph and the police can only do 150.

Detrevni
06-17-2008, 17:32
Eh it was stupid but the girl was a retard for killing herself over the internet calling her stupid.

World actually might be better off without her... lol.


OHNOES TOO SOON

DoomKitty
06-17-2008, 18:13
There is a block button. Idiot child. Not the womans fault the kid was stupid.
And aren't you supposed to be 14 too join myspace anyways? Oh noes.

The Moody Ronin
06-17-2008, 18:46
Drew's daughter had been a friend of 13-year-old neighbor Megan Meier and the fake account was used to send cruel messages to the girl, including one stating the world would be better off without her. Megan hanged herself in 2006.

This...this makes no sense... The woman's daughter had a friend so she decided to harass her to death?

As for the rest of the thread... no comment. I seem to have lost my deck of stock "blame the dead girl" comments...

Seegtease
06-17-2008, 21:14
This...this makes no sense... The woman's daughter had a friend so she decided to harass her to death?

I was thinking the same thing. Do they even have a motive placed on her? Why the heck hasn't the article told possible motives? Or why they suspected her in the first place?

And honestly, what adult would go out of their way to make a vulnerable child depressed? Really. A friend of their own daughter.

It makes no sense at all. I don't know much about the case, but I don't have enough imagination to think of a motive, and I see no reason Drew should be guilty. Maybe her daughter wasn't such a good friend and did it.

Charlie
06-17-2008, 21:33
I give none of them my sympathy. The woman was in the wrong for the shit she did to the girl (if I were in the girl's shoes, I'd have burnt her fucking house down), and the girl was obviously in the wrong for hanging herself. I know there's a lot of shit 13 year olds go through in their minds, and especially in cases like these, but you don't fucking commit suicide over it. You TAKE REAL ACTION!

Seegtease
06-17-2008, 22:12
Charlie, you're pretty harsh on mere suspects.

deathofcheese
06-17-2008, 23:35
This was first in the news quite a few months ago, and I remember it being quite more damning against the mother. If I can find the original Wired article, I'll post it.

EDIT

Found it (http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/11/vigilante_justice).

Killer_Man_
06-18-2008, 01:34
No, I'm sure it's 13, Doom.

Second, why wasn't the daughter charged of that mother was charged? To be honest, if I remember correctly. It's kinda like what happened to a co-worker. She had a computer in her house, her or her husband has no idea to even work the damn thing but their children and grand children did. They downloaded movies and music but who gets blamed? The owner of the computer. Her and her husband. This is problay what happened to Drew. Daughter assaults and does illegal things, parent is to blame.

Seegtease
06-18-2008, 02:31
I didn't read the whole article you posted, SE, but the photo was enough. She has the face of somebody who could do that. And at least they provide a story there.